This
October, the Synod on the family begins its deliberation in
Rome
amid much speculation, hope and not a little confusion.
Given the circumstances of Francis calling this Synod it was bound to give rise
to rumour and discussion in both the Church and in the Secular Media.
It
will run for two weeks, from the 5th to the 19th of
October with its collective focus on “The pastoral challenges of the family in
the context of envangelisation”. This is only the third time that an
Extraordinary Synod has been called since the Synod of Bishops began meeting in
1967.
Expectations
are high and already a pre-emptive strike has been organised by Cardinals Burke,
Meuller and others seeking to prevent offering the Eucharist to those in
irregular marriage situations. The compassionate attitude of Francis, Walter
Kasper and others is being challenged and real difficulties are likely to be
unavoidable.
Cardinal
Kasper’s comments earlier in the year were reported by the Catholic News
Service/USCCB. “The Catholic Church needs to find a
way to offer healing, strength and salvation to Catholics whose marriages have
failed, who are committed to making a new union work and who long to do so
within the church and with the grace of Communion.”
Further,
the whole issue of same-gender marriage may have to be considered, for it is a
question that has forced itself onto the secular agenda and is seeking a
response from all of us. Those fateful words spoken on the flight back from
Brazil
were brief but significant “Who
am I to judge?”
And
all the time the rejection by so many of the teaching Humane
Vitae, promulgated in 1968 by Paul VI, hovers in the background. Family life
as it is has to be faced and both joys and difficulties explored.
So
let us not expect too much straight away, but at least celebrate that a
discussion is about to start that has been a long time coming. The role of the Synod,
Pope Paul VI said, is to examine ‘the
signs of the times’ and ‘to provide a deeper interpretation of divine designs and the
constitution of the Catholic Church’ in order to ‘foster the unity and co-operation of bishops around the world with the
Holy See.’
That
position has not changed but in the light of a real wish to see Collegiality
effected in the universal Church, it is to be hoped that the Holy See listens
carefully to the views of the people beyond the See of Rome, seeking the Sensus
Fidelium, listening to those countless Christians who wish to live in accordance
with the Faith of the universal Church but who also ask for an honest
re-appraisal of a number of contentious issues in the light of our modern
experience. An excellent article in the on-line edition of
AMERICA
, Revisiting
remarriage by Sr. Mary Anne Walsh is well worth reading at
http://americamagazine.org/print/160184
In
the midst of the debate, the public statements, the rumors and the secular
speculation, let us not forget to pray for the inspiration of the Spirit, that
we might be open to guidance for future progress of the Church and not remain
closed in an historical mindset that no longer serves our missionary needs.
END
---------------