In
recent days Francis has undertaken a delicate and tiring visit to
Sri Lanka
and the
Philippines
.
When people meet, they often present gifts to each
other as a sign of greeting and good will. The image at the head of this posting
is striking for a number of reasons. It shows Sri Lankan Hindu priest Kurakkal Somasundaram, with Pope Francis during an
inter-religious meeting in
Colombo
. That such a meeting took place at
all is to be applauded.
But look further at the detail. One man, clean
shaven, evidently elderly, faces another, also advanced in years but with a full
grey- white beard. Francis is wearing his white zucchetto matching his white cassock, the Hindu priest has his head
covered by a pagri, the Indian form of
turban worn by Hindu priests, in the same saffron tone as his robes. He is
presenting Francis with a brilliant yellow shawl, a gift of welcome. It is an
image of a man from the Western culture of
Argentina
meeting a man from the East, from
Sri Lanka
, a simple statement in a blaze of
colour
The over-riding message was for peaceful
understanding between peoples, of religious tolerance and of care not to offend.
How do we balance that position with the principle of freedom of expression that
is such a vital aspect of Western democracy, an argument that has been
graphically highlighted through the attack on the journalists working for
Charlie Hebdo and discussed endlessly in the media since then?
Where is the edge between freedom of speech and
gratuitous insult? How do we recognize the sensibilities of others, those with
whom we disagree? What are our responsibilities when it comes to satirical
humor, where a captioned cartoon image can be stronger than many hundreds of
sharp words?
Those who might be offended can of course always
turn away and ignore any particular situation, but that action, laudable though
it might be, may contain an inner hurt which is hard to live with, especially if
it is a matter of fundamental belief.
The papal plea for reconciliation in Sri Lanka, a
place where there has been violent inter-community conflict over many years, as
well as his request for social justice in the Philippines, later in his visit,
show us a fellow human being willing to speak his mind in a courageous manner.
In conclusion to the excellent Tablet Editorial last
week, Tom Heneghan wrote that, “One thing is sure
– Charlie Hebdo will go on insulting anyone it likes. The French media quickly
rallied around it to provide office space, funds and equipment to continue
publishing; the Government pledged financial support. Long queues formed outside
news stands in
France
on Wednesday for this
week’s edition of the satirical magazine and five million copies were being
printed to meet the demand. The cover shows a tearful Prophet Muhammad holding a
“Je suis Charlie” sign under the headline, “All is forgiven.”
This
is the reality we must live with, always willing to respond to what we perceive
as unjust comment, always preserving the right for opinion to be expressed, but
always careful that violent reaction is not the outcome of thoughtless words.
Remember those oft quoted words of Martin Niemöller, a protestant pastor in the
Germany
of the Third Reich
First
they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then
they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then
they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then
they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
END