July 1, 2012   David Timbs (Melbourne)    David's previous articles     

 

Jesus is too much for us  

An element, integral to the Gospel story is that Jesus underwent something akin to a profound conversion experience despite the fact that he himself was sinless and in no need of repentance. At some stage in his human consciousness, he became keenly aware of the desperate plight of the people around him. Perhaps it was the preaching of John the Baptist that jolted Jesus into his own sense of an ethical apocalyptic, that is, the revelation of God’s moral claim on the world and on humanity and of God’s wish that humanity be restored to wholeness.

Jesus’ encounter with John was probably key to this understanding. Sinless though he was, he submitted himself to a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sin. Jesus identified himself with humanity, sinful, estranged and alienated from God. It was this conversion that provides the context for the descent of God’s Spirit upon him and for his vocation as the Son, the beloved, in whom God is well pleased.

Immediately after his baptism, Jesus, now full of the Spirit moves off alone into the chaotic world of the demons in order to serve notice on their native ground that he was here to stay and that he would get the better of them. He was aware that the power of the demon lay in its capacity to strip people of their human integrity and drive them to despair. Jesus himself would meet this demon again in Gethsemane. 

After this opening contest, the first great act of Jesus’ ministry was to go home to visit his family and clan.

Luke’s setting is probably on the feast of Yom Kippur and at the beginning of the Jubilee Year, decreed in Jewish law to be observed every fiftieth year. Jesus pays a visit to his home town of Nazareth and it was in the meeting place for the local worshipping community that Jesus was invited to read the passage for the day. The prescribed text for that solemn occasion was from the third book of Isaiah 61: 1-2,

The spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord. (Lk 4: 18-19)

Jesus immediately scandalized his own folk by announcing that the words of Isaiah would be the programme for his public life. He made it clear that he felt most at home with those who were the victims of oppression and that the ancient commands of God etched into the collective Israelite psyche would be honoured in his words and deeds,

You shall do no wrong to a stranger or oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt  ….. You shall not oppress a stranger; you know the heart of the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. (Ex 22: 21; 22: 9) ….. learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression. Defend the fatherless, plead for the widow. (Is 1: 17)

Jesus was extremely conscious of the oppression and burden people experienced as a result of the intense application of the Mosaic Law and the myriad regulations which flowed from it. His parables constantly reflected popular oppressions of many kinds: social and religious alienation resulting from class discrimination, association, ritual uncleanness or disease; the bitter hardship of heavy Herodian taxation and the ongoing tensions between the peasant farmer and the wealthy landowners. In word and dramatic gesture, Jesus revealed that he felt natively at home in this world and that he identified with its excluded and despised people. They were his family, his mother, his sisters and his brothers. Theirs was the Kingdom of God.

In Mark’s brutally confronting narrative, Jesus is depicted as being so involved with the wrong people, those scorned as sinners and outcasts by Jewish religious authorities, that his own blood family determined that he had lost his mind. For the sake of family honour and for his own wellbeing, they came to rescue him. The scribes and Pharisees, following their own script, attributed his behaviour to demonic possession (Mk 3: 20-30).

Jesus continued to agitate and disturb both clan and religious opponents with his outrageous preaching and action. He so affronted and scandalized the people of his own village that their faithlessness rendered him utterly powerless. Jesus became himself the primary symbol of those he stood by and represented the rejected, the outcast and the excluded ones.

Luke illustrates just how deeply offensive and subversive the parables of Jesus were in the ears of his audience. He asked questions and demanded answers which defied logic. Jesus was unreasonable. When criticised by the religious authorities for eating with toll collectors and sinners, Jesus took hold of their world of comfortable moralising and turned it on its head. He told them three stories of loss and the lengths to which a shockingly uneconomical God will go in search of the alienated. But Jesus stresses reason to its limits as he ventures even further into the territories of the unimaginable and preposterous.

What if, Jesus might suggest to the sanctimonious religious bean counters, the lost sheep is GOD, the lost coin is the missing GOD, that the prodigal son is the prodigal GOD, that Zacchaeus up the tree is GOD on the lookout, that the leper, the woman with the haemorrhage, the grieving widow, the blind, the crippled man are GOD? 

The driving principle of Jesus was that to identify with the despised, the marginalised, the lost and outcast was to identify with God. Jesus reflected congruence of this message in his actions by constantly demonstrating the welcome, bounty and hospitality of God to all. Israel was not ready for this kind of news and Jesus, its messenger, paid the price.  He was ultimately rejected by his own people as breaker of God’s Law and as a dangerous perverter of the people. He was accused of and condemned for leading the people away from God (Lk 23: 2).

Jesus was the most dangerous man in history. The temptation, ever facing even his own closest followers, is to limit and domesticate him within the boundaries of our own logic, presumption, manipulation and comfort. He will never be contained by these.

No outcasts were cast out far enough in Jesus’s world to make him shun them…this includes Judas…A tremendous ingenuity has been used to compromise these uncompromising words, Jesus is too much for us.  

- Garry Wills (2006), What Jesus Meant.  

David Timbs writes from Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

HTML Comment Box is loading comments...