May 15, 2012 Martin Mallon (Ireland) Martin's previous articles
Towards
an Assembly of the Irish Catholic Church
The
meeting in
The
event itself was of the Holy Spirit, who filled everyone with hope for the
future of the Church. The main thrust from the meeting was to have the teachings
of Vatican II implemented. The general consensus was that dialogue was the way
forward, starting with families, prayer groups, the Parish, the Diocese and then
on the national level.
One
speaker, Fr Tony Butler, quoted
Another
speaker mentioned that the church cannot preach human rights effectively if it
does not practice what it preaches, referring to the priests being silenced in
secret with no right of appeal. Secrecy is an issue that the Church must examine
again together with mental reservation as neither of these has a place in the
community envisaged by Vatican II.
My
74 year old father-in-law accompanied me to the meeting as he has been disturbed
by recent developments in the
The
main impact of the Monday 7 meeting could be the fact of the event itself. This
could impact on a number of levels:
1)
The
meeting showed that the people of God have a desire to organise and meet
together to register protest at
2)
Churches,
the people of God, in other countries, such as
3)
The
event was broadcast on the National TV news that evening and reported in the
national newspapers the following day. This is the “new evangelisation” in
action; a witness that the Church is alive, well and not redundant.
4)
The
bishops, Papal Nuncio and
This
was a new development in modern Church history. The people of God, with the Holy
Spirit speaking through them, meeting together to call on the hierarchy to fully
implement the Holy Spirit inspired and directed Second Vatican Ecumenical
Council.
In
the editorial of the Irish Catholic of 10 May, Garry O’Sullivan summed up well
when he wrote that the 7 May meeting made it clear: “that there is a piercing
need in the Catholic Church in Ireland to create a space for dialogue: a space
where everyone can express their hopes and anxieties about the future of the
Faith.”
O’Sullivan
added that: “No one should be frightened by a plea for a space for dialogue.
Such a place does not imply that everything is up for grabs or that essentials
of the Faith may be set aside.” It does imply: “that there can be space to
listen together to the Word of God and discern what the voice of the Holy Spirit
is saying to the men and women…in this present generation.”
He points out that Tertullian noted how non-Christians marvelled at Christ’s first followers on observing: “See how the Christians love one another.” We must practice this as we attempt to implement Vatican II, or the whole endeavour is meaningless.