2014 articles     2013 articles       2012 articles

 

2014-02-23        Daniel Daring     


Where Are Those Fools? 

Leviticus 19:1-2, 17-18; 1 Corinthians 3:16-23; Matthew 5:38-48

(Comments welcome here)        
 
 

 

In his Life on the Mississippi (1893), Mark Twain shares with us the process of mastering the language of the river. The process had just one goal in mind: "the safe piloting of a steamboat." New to steam boating, Twain often marveled at the beauty of the river, but as the course was proceeding the awe and wonder was replaced by a deconstructive analysis of the Mississippi's language. A sunset indicated a wind the following day, a floating log meant that the river was rising, and a "slanting mark on the waters" was revealing a bluff reef. Twain got his Master of Arts in steam boating, but - as he confessed - he lost something precious that could never be restored: "all the grace, the beauty, the poetry, had gone out of the majestic river!"

 "If you think that you are wise in this age, you should become fools so that you may become wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God" (1 Corinthians 3:18-19). Paul places this passage within the section that discusses the issue of division within the Corinthian community. It seems that what he meant by worldly wisdom was a kind of wisdom that was proud of its knowledge, divisive, and exclusive. The letter of James is more precise in this matter. A worldly wisdom is characterized by "envy and selfish ambition," whereas a godly wisdom "is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits, without a trace of partiality or hypocrisy" (James 3:17). But if we dare to bring the two descriptions together we come with a shocking conclusion: people who follow the godly wisdom are fools in the eyes of the world. Could that be true?  

According to N. Chomsky, our educational system is extremely competitive: "you've got to beat down the person next to you, and just look out for yourself." That would clearly indicate the principle of "envy and selfish ambition" the two marks of earthly and devilish wisdom (James 3:14-15). Aside from being competitive, our educational system is mostly concerned with indoctrinating people, instead of teaching them how to think and be creative. The goal of our educational system is to form a conformist who will be able to fit well within a system and properly perform the role assigned to him/her. That would call for partiality and hypocrisy,  other characteristics of earthly and unspiritual wisdom. It does not come then as a surprise to know that when  Einstein was opposing McCarthyism by advocating non-cooperation, he was called by the media a rebel, irresponsible, and even a jackass. This only proves our thesis that those who do not conform are considered fools. But how did they become such fools?

 Christianity has a rich tradition of saints who are known as holy fools, people who take the Gospel seriously and live outside of the conventional wisdom of our world. The most famous are St. Basil the Blessed (1468-1557), who is supposed to have  given the Tsar Ivan the Terrible a piece of meat during Lent telling him: "Why abstain from meat when you murder people?", and St. Francis of Assisi, with his peaceful approach to Muslims when popes and other saints were campaigning for crusades. I think also of Gandhi with his belief that "an eye for an eye will only make the whole world blind". He also could also be placed in the "fools" category. To be a holy fool or creative thinker and non-conformist requires a unique approach to life and sets of principles that see truth as being discovered, not created. Einstein did not create his famous equation E=mc², he discovered it while probing the mystery of the universe. Once it was discovered, it was then applied and tested, and after being successfully tested it was upheld even if to make a stand for it was costly.

 "If you think that you are wise in this age, you should become fools so that you may become wise." I wonder if Twain was really right to claim that the beauty of the Mississippi river could never be restored to him. I wonder if we are right in clinging to the standards of our education that turn us into imitators and conformists. Perhaps a little foolishness would do us a lot of good. It could set us free from the "chain" of measuring up to the standards set up for us by others, and of competing with others for power and position. It has to be a truly liberating experience to have no ambitions, to be contented, to admire the Creator and His creation, and to wonder at His mercy that "makes his sun rise on the bad and the good, and causes rain to fall on the just and the unjust" (Matthew 5:45). 

 Let me end with a story about the famous philosopher, Diogenes of Sinope. Once he was seen by Aristippus eating lentils. Aristippus who lived comfortably by flattering the king said: "If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on such garbage as lentils." Diogenes is supposed to have responded: "If you had learned to live on lentils you would not have to flatter the king" (Anthony de Mello, Song of the Bird).

   --------------------------