Darlene's previous articles Darlene's background 2013-03-03 Darlene Starrs, Canada blogger Awaken the sleeping giant, the laity |
We have been told by various theological sources what changes need to happen for the Church to fulfill the mandate of Vatican II. Many of those sources are offered for reading on this website. Two of the theologians that come to mind are an American theologian named Richard Guillardetz, and an Irish Jesuit theologian Father Gerry O’Hanlon.
Richard Guillardetz in his lecture,Fulfilling the Unrealized Vision of Vatican II tells us what in his understanding remains to be completed for the fulfillment of Vatican II. He stresses the need for creating the “structures” of the post-Vatican II Church, structures that are collaborative and collegial, like synods of bishops.
Father
Gerry O’Hanlon has written a book entitled: A
New Vision for the Catholic Church: A View from
While
there is much to be considered for the work to be done, one of the greatest
feats to be accomplished, and which is most urgent, is a comprehensive
mobilization of the lay people. On
page 36 of Father O’Hanlon’s book, he tells us that at the 1987 Synod
of Bishops, a Cardinal Tomas O’Fiaich said it was time to “awaken the
sleeping giant, the laity”. Indeed,
the Vatican II documents affirm that the laity are just as central to the Church
as the hierarchy, and that the entire People of God are the Church.
Interestingly,
when I reflect on this reality, that the laity are just as central to the Church
as the hierarchy, I am reminded that the Church and the Churches that were
created prior to Christianity becoming legal in 325 AD, would have only known
the “laity” as it were, to be central to the Church.
Once the church expands and expands, it becomes legal, and so, as the
Church and the Churches are more and more secularized and sophisticated, it
seems as if the “fibers are pulled away from the cloth”. Eventually,
what appears to happen, is that, the “ordinary member of the Church”, is no
longer really treated as the Church. Whether
it was intended or not, the clergy and religious assume the identity and role of
being the Church. Vatican II, which
takes place between 1962 and 1965, really is a RECOVERY of the People of God as
Church.
The
mobilization of the lay people, has the potential to affect change in the
Church, in every way, and at every level. You
would see so many of our current, troubling issues, disappear completely, or at
the very least, change in their shape and color. If
the Church had a comprehensive, mobilization of the laity, there might be
all kinds of changes, like lay people presiding
at Eucharist, more lay people
involved in teaching and preaching, as well as increased lay participation in
deliberative voting, whether at the local parish council level, or in the higher
domains of the Church. In order for a “sweeping” mobilization to happen, we
have to overcome a huge hurdle.
You
might say, the “hurdle” is all the opposition that would come from the
”powers that be” and lay people who hold fast to the status quo and
traditionalist position. No doubt there will be opposition, but I believe the
greatest hurdle is something that has to be overcome within lay Catholics and
doesn’t necessarily have to do with any opposition from our predominantly
clerical leadership or any other group.
I suggest that until the majority of Catholics understand that they are Church, we cannot have an effective mobilization of the laity. The attitude still prevails that only the priests, brothers, sisters, bishops, cardinals, and the pope are the Church and have sole permission to “be” and “act” as the authority of Christ. This would be especially true, where I am in Canada. As well, we have an old, old, belief in the Catholic Church, that God speaks directly through our priests, and bishops, and especially the Pope. Catholics would not think of questioning them, because to do so, would be to question God and that might be a fatal disobedience.
We
have seen for sure that the
Until one understands that she/he is Church, one cannot question one’s rights and obligations for being Church. Until one understands that she/he is Church, one will not recognize that each has a vocation, a service to be done for the mission of the Church. Until one understands that she/he is Church, there will not be the understanding that all are called to serve and to be holy. Until one understands that she/he is Church, there will not be a cataclysmic pushback to the current, clerical leadership that has taken to itself, what has been identified by some theologians, as ‘Absolute Power.”
In
any of the renewal movements occurring at this time in our Church history,
whether that is in Germany, or Ireland, or in Australia, this
understanding, that We, as individuals in Christ, and as a Body in Christ, are
Church, is the foundational belief, for the laity to embrace responsibility for
being Church and exercising their inherent “power and authority”. “Pushing
for renewal”, is very much the Church/Christ “business” of the universal
laity.
The
“awaking and raising of the sleeping giant, called, the laity”, can only
come about, when the majority of Catholics have truly understood what it
is for the laity to be Church. The
work of some of the lay people in
Ireland, called the Association of Irish Catholics, are organizing meetings
around Ireland, to meet with and provide information, on how the Irish Catholic
Church is dependent upon the People, to be responsible for the reform and
renewal of their Church and of their faith. The work of these Catholics in the
ACI, of organizing and conducting meetings, is a necessary work, and a prophetic
work, one that reflects the scripture passages about “preparing the soil,”
“sowing the seed”, and “gathering the remnant”, for generations of
future Irish Catholic Christians who will also be commissioned to carry on the
mission of the Church and the various ministries of Christ.
There
are other Catholics, the world over, who are a part of what I call “pushing
for change”, “pushing for reform”, and “pushing for renewal” .
I use the term “pushing” because of the idea that the Holy Spirit is giving
birth to the vision of Vatican II. When
a woman gives birth, she needs to push, so, I use “push”, not in the sense,
of “taking by force”, but in the sense of “giving birth”. I am reminded
of Mary, our Blessed Mother, who had to “push”, and gave birth to Jesus, the
Church.
The understanding that We, as the laity, are the Church, stems from the Vatican II documents, but more importantly from the theological shift at Vatican II, which placed the Incarnate Christ in the People of God, as opposed to a structure or to the clerical leadership alone. We, as Church, are having to explore, penetrate, and understand fully, the meaning of the People of God, as an indwelling of the Incarnate Christ. What comes to mind is the following scripture passage from Ephesians, Chapter two, verses19-22:
…you
are fellow citizens of the saints and members of the household of God. You form
a building which rises
on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the
capstone. Through him
the whole structure is fitted together and takes shape as a holy temple in the
Lord; in him you are being built
into this temple, to become a dwelling place for God in the spirit.
This
scripture passage from Ephesians tells us we, as the people of God, are the
dwelling place for God, in the spirit. Given
the Word of God from the scripture, how could the “powers that be”, at
Vatican II, not affirm, that the laity are just as central to the Church as the
hierarchy? Given that centrality,
and the reality that individually and collectively we are a “holy temple”,
how could we not understand ourselves as Church and behave accordingly?
What
does it mean for Christ to be dwelling in and among us as the Incarnation?
I believe that for the soul that is truly rooted in the Father/Mother,
Son, and Holy Spirit, the soul possesses all the faculties of Christ to exercise
the power of His ministry. Is the
Body of Christ, like the individual soul, lacking anything to represent Christ?
Naturally, we must be living out our commitment to Christ in all integrity, and
be appropriately educated, and if we are, why would anyone not be suitably
empowered for the ministry of Christ? We
can refer here to
For
the ministry of preaching, teaching, and presiding at Eucharist, is it really
necessary to have seven years of education, be a single, celibate, male, and
have a supposedly extra-ordinary anointing by a bishop, that says only you, with
a special divine branding on your soul can do these ministries?
We have today in the Church, in many parts of the world, a very well
educated laity, not to mention some of the very best male and female lay
theologians. In our local parishes we have well educated members. I suggest,
that it is from our charismatically and professionally prepared parishioners,
that we need to call forth our ministers.
The traditional cultic priesthood has been charged with quite a number of major responsibilities. In presiding at Eucharist, is also the preaching and teaching that must be executed with the sermon. If we are really honest, I’m sure you and I have noticed that being “ordained” has not necessarily guaranteed that we hear dynamic and inspirational preaching and teaching.
However, we as the Church would need to secure not only someone blessing bread and wine, but having a person(s) who are theologically and charismatically capable of providing the Catholic Christian Community with the “preaching” and “teaching” ministry. I would suggest that the Church’s parish councils would need to expand to include the Ministry of the Eucharist, the Ministry of Preaching, and the Ministry of Teaching.
It
is no coincidence that we find in the documents of Vatican II the direction that
we must recognize the charisms in our midst, and call them forward.
We need to know the gifts of the people in our parishes, call them forth,
and have our local bishop install our ministers.
Would having an installed lay person change the meaning of the presence
of the Body and Blood of Christ? No. Christ has assured us He is always
present to us individually, but also, where 2 or 3 are gathered in His Name, so
He is there and therefore, it is truly the Body and Blood of Christ we are
receiving, as we have always believed.
In
1999, I wrote an editorial, submitted to the Western Catholic Reporter, that
spoke of the Church being “Too Reliant On Old Theology”. The opening
sentence is as follows: “We have no shortage of priests”. I would tell you
more, but there is a copyright on the article:
You can find this article on the web.
It is entitled “Church Too Reliant On Old Theology”.
You will also find responses to me which were not necessarily kind. The
link is: wcr.ab.ca/old-site/columns/letters/1999/letters112299.shtml
There is not very much I would change in that editorial, except that I want to make clear that I believe, we are receiving the “Body and Blood of Christ”. I think the change occurs with the presence of Christ and it doesn’t mean that the person, “blessing bread and wine” has divine power, other than what flows from the indwelling of Christ, in that presiding person, and in the Body of Christ assembled. Our inherent grace and power flows as well, from our baptismal call, of being Priest, Prophet, and King with Christ..
Father Joe O’Leary, on the ACP (Association of Catholic Priests) website, in one of his submitted comments, mentions a recent book, entitled L’Eglise va-t-elle disparaitre, (Seuil, 2013) by Jean-Claude Barreau. He is a priest and essayist, who, in the book, discusses the role of the laity and the Ministry of the Eucharist. The book is written in French, and so I am glad that Father O’Leary gives the readers a wee snippet from the book. The author, Jean-Claude Barreau, according to Father O’Leary, is “urging the ordination of ordinary, mature, lay folk who’ll keep their families and day jobs, and thereby bring an end, gently, to the Tridentine Epoch”.
While
Father Barreau, still refers to “ordination”, he is suggesting that the
Church find Eucharistic presiders from among the laity. Jean-Claude Barreau’s
ideas appear to me to be an example of progressive theological thinking around
Eucharistic Ministry and the role of lay people. At least, lay people are
being considered and that would be a part of the raising of the “sleeping
giant”. If anyone wants to find this book, it is apparently available on
“Amazon” on March 18th.
I
consider the re-evaluation of the role of the laity and the ministry of the
Eucharist to be a necessity for the Church.
I find I have little patience with the bemoaning tale, that we can’t
have Eucharist because we have no priests. I say, in truth, we have no shortage
of priests, but an abundance! The Lord says, “I will deal bountifully with my
beloved”. Out of our abundance, of
the People of God, those who are supposed to be considered, just as central to
the Church as the
Does
this mean that we have no need of clerics? Certainly not, but what the laity
need, is to be integral to the decision-making at all levels of the Church, from
the local parish council, to diocesan councils, and finally to
The
mobilization of the laity, as I say, will invariably affect all aspects of the
Church. There is a very necessary
accompaniment for this mobilization, and that is, the “New Evangelization”.
Our Catholic Christians need to be “immersed” in the scriptures and
need to be “immersed” in a rejuvenated relationship with Jesus Christ.
I long to see Catholic parishes bursting with Small Christian
Communities, that is, small groups of parishioners who come together, outside of
Sunday Eucharist, to read, to study, and to pray with the scriptures, and to
share their faith and journey with Christ. As
On
Ironically,
on Friday, February 22nd, the
As
Chris McDonnell said, in his blog on Tuesday, there are many mistakes that need
to be corrected and in the Church’s current situation of disarray, as John
Wotherspoon, has called it, the mistakes cannot continue. You may see a lot more
lightning strikes above the
The Church’s crisis would become almost “intractable” especially, if the new Pope is closed to reform and closed to the modern age. Perhaps, “reform and renewal” does not precisely describe what could really be happening in terms of change. I believe what we really ought to be speaking about is a “Paradigm Shift” and that entails more than moving furniture around, and even more than rigorous reform. This is sure to take many years, but it might well be what we are experiencing, even if it can “only be seen through a glass dimly”. That would be the old order shifting, and disappearing. I am reminded of the Words from Mary’s Canticle: “God has shown the strength of His arm”, “He has brought down the mighty from their thrones, and has lifted up the lowly”.
I
have described, in the above essay, is a paradigm shift, that can create a
Church transformed and transfigured into the image of Christ. First, is the
mobilization of the laity, and second, is for the laity to be re-rooted in
Christ because of a new evangelization. We
need to overcome the greatest hurdle, of not believing and understanding that
We, the laity, are the Church, a belief that flows from the Vatican II
documents, that flows from the theological reality, that we are, individually
and collectively, a dwelling place for Christ, that flows from our original,
apostolic Church experience, and that flows from the Words of Scripture. This
understanding will lead to the raising of the lay people, and it will change
forever the current situation in the Church. With a renewed life in Christ, the
Church can and will be the Glory and Joy of Jesus Christ.